M Derivation
Appendix 3: Derivation
Setup for an special case
You have a family of 10 relays, each relay providing 1 GB of bandwidth and staked with 10 $ANYONE. You want to compare this to the family as a whole having the collective resources of 10 GB of bandwidth and staked with 100 $ANYONE, and examine how the rewards scale.
Definitions and Equation
: A family of 10 relays, each with 1 GB of bandwidth and 10 $ANYONE.
: Boost factor for a family of 10.
: The multiplier for having 10 times the amount of $ANYONE.
Given Relations
Equivalence of Family to Single Relay with Boost: This means the family of 10, each with (G1, A10), boosted, is equivalent to one relay with 10 GB and 100 $ANYONE.
Relation of Individual to Group without Family Boost: Ten individual relays each with 1 GB and 10 $ANYONE have the collective power of one relay with 10 GB and 10 $ANYONE without considering any boost.
Calculate :
We want to express in terms of known quantities. Start by considering the relationship between and given :
This equation states that the reward for a relay with 100 $ANYONE is times the reward for a relay with 10 $ANYONE.
Use of in Calculating :
Since must also be the sum of the rewards of each relay in the family, boosted by , we can also say:
Using the relationship and substituting it into the equation derived from the family boost: F_1(G_{10}, A_{100}) \times B_{10} = B_{10} \times 10 \times F_1(G_1, A_{100}) = B_{10} \times 10 \times M_{10} \times F_1(G_1, A_{10})$ $F_{10}(G_1, A_{10}) = B_{10} \times 10 \times M_{10} \times F_1(G_1, A_{10})
Equating the two expressions for :
Solving for : Cancel out common terms:
Conclusion:
From the above, it appears that under the assumptions used for the calculations. However, this result seems counterintuitive as it implies no scaling effect of rewards despite a tenfold increase in staking. However, if the assumptions are true, then token scaling efforts should not affect the rewards or else the assumptions cannot be considered true.
: Generalizations for all M_n$: Generalizations for all $n \in {[1,2,3,4,...]}
Revised Definitions and General Assumptions
Let's define as the reward multiplier for a relay when the $ANYONE staked is increased -fold, while bandwidth remains constant. This generalization will help establish a broader rule applicable to any positive integer , gigabytes of bandwidth per relay, and a minimum $ANYONE stake of $ANYONE.
Generalized Given Relations:
Equivalence of Family to Single Relay with General Boost: (Equation 1) Here, a family of relays, each with y GB and $ANYONE, when boosted, this is equivalent to one relay with GB and $ANYONE. is the boost factor for a family of .
Relation of Individual to Group without Family Boost: (Equation 2) This states that individual relays, each with GB and $ANYONE, together provide the resources of one relay with GB and $ANYONE, without any additional boosts.
Definition of
Let’s Define the following way:
EQ3: (Equation 3)
Derivation of :
We can follow the exact same process as we did for :
Since must also be the sum of the rewards of each relay in the family, boosted by , we can also say:
Using the relationship and substituting it into the equation derived from the family boost:
Equating the two expressions for :
Solving for M_{n}$: $n\times B_{n} \times F_1(G_y, A_{r}) = n \times B_{n} \times M_{n} \times F_1(G_y, A_{r}) Cancel out common terms:
The conclusion that for all positive integers with any gigabyte relays and minimum $ANYONE requirement .
Last updated